Home / Editorial standards
Trust and control

Legal content needs a higher publishing standard.

NewsFeed uses AI-assisted drafting, but AI output is never treated as a source and generation is never the same action as publishing.

Our non-negotiable standards

These rules govern public NewsFeed examples and the drafting workflow supplied to client firms.

Source before summary

Every article begins with a specific public source. The source remains visible and is cited in structured data. AI output is not evidence.

Allegations stay allegations

Unproven claims remain attributed. A filing is not a verdict, an arrest is not a conviction, and an investigation is not a finding of fault.

Jurisdiction is explicit

State and federal context must come from the source or reliable legal context. One state's rules are not presented as universal.

No specific legal advice

Pages explain general process and common issues. They do not tell an individual what to file, whether they have a claim, or what result to expect.

No invented authority

NewsFeed does not fabricate statutes, cases, quotes, outcomes, reviews, rankings, traffic, leads, or AI citations.

Firm approval controls client publishing

The law firm is the final editor of record for pages on its domain. Authorized reviewers approve, edit, or decline each draft.

AI disclosure

AI assists drafting. It does not replace sourcing or accountability.

NewsFeed uses AI tools to structure source material and produce a first draft under strict instructions. Client content does not publish until the firm approves it. The public editorial blog uses an organizational byline and does not claim lawyer authorship or lawyer review.

  • Original source retained
  • Draft and publish are separate actions
  • Sensitive claims use conservative attribution
  • Private individuals are minimized where possible
  • Corrections update visible copy and dateModified
  • No guarantee of rankings or AI citations

Source quality policy

Legal/YMYL explainers should rely on accountable reporting and primary material, not scraped summaries or promotional distribution.

Preferred

  • Court opinions and public filings
  • Government and agency releases
  • Established local reporting
  • Reputable national and specialist publications
  • Original reporting with a named publisher

Rejected as a sole source

  • Scraped headline aggregators
  • Anonymous reposts
  • Promotional press-release networks
  • Entertainment and celebrity-value sites
  • Social posts without corroboration

Correction and revision policy

Anyone can report a factual error to [email protected] with the page URL and supporting information. Substantive corrections update the article and its structured modification date. A client-firm correction enters the same approval workflow before the live page changes.

Important: NewsFeed is not a law firm. Public examples are general legal information, not legal advice. Client firms remain responsible for final review of content published under their name.

Standards questions

Are public blog posts attorney-reviewed?

No attorney-review claim is made. The public blog uses an organizational editorial process and clearly states that NewsFeed is not a law firm.

Who is responsible for client-site content?

The subscribing law firm is the final editor of record and approves the draft before publication.

Can a source be corrected later?

Yes. Material updates and reliable corrections can trigger a revised draft, but the client still approves any change to its site.

Evaluate the standard on a real draft.

Your first three articles are free, and each remains a draft until you approve it. Then $297/month, cancel anytime.

Get 3 articles free