Personal Injury ·September 10, 2026 ·6 min read ·By the NewsFeed Editorial Team

What Happened

A closely watched criminal trial in Plymouth County, Massachusetts, ended last week in a mistrial after jurors reportedly deliberated for about seven days without reaching a unanimous verdict. The defendant, a mother in her mid-30s, faced charges tied to the 2023 deaths of her three young children. According to reports, one juror has now spoken publicly, describing tense deliberations and a single holdout who could not be persuaded to reach agreement with the rest of the panel.

The jurors were reportedly given a range of possible verdicts to consider, including first-degree murder, second-degree murder, manslaughter, not guilty, and not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility — a Massachusetts standard used when serious mental illness is alleged to have prevented the defendant from appreciating the wrongfulness of her conduct. A follow-up court hearing is reportedly scheduled for later this month to determine next steps.

Separately, the defendant has reportedly filed a civil lawsuit alleging that multiple medical providers failed to properly diagnose and treat her psychiatric condition before the tragedy. That civil matter is a distinct legal proceeding from the criminal case.

Why It Matters Legally

This story sits at the intersection of several legal issues that lawyers and courts watch carefully: how criminal cases handle severe mental illness, what happens when a jury cannot reach unanimity, and how civil medical malpractice claims can proceed in parallel with criminal proceedings.

For the personal injury bar in particular, the civil claim against the healthcare providers is the piece that draws the most direct interest. Personal injury law, as an umbrella, covers medical malpractice — a specialized area involving allegations that a doctor, hospital, or other clinician failed to meet the accepted standard of care and that this failure caused harm. Cases involving psychiatric care are especially complex because mental-health conditions can be difficult to diagnose, treatment plans are often collaborative, and outcomes depend on many factors outside any one provider's control.

The criminal side also matters. A mistrial is not an acquittal. It generally means the jury could not agree, and prosecutors typically must decide whether to retry the case, offer a plea resolution, or drop the charges. That decision can hinge on the strength of the evidence, the reasons for the deadlock, and the wishes of surviving family members.

Who Could Be Affected

Cases like this touch several categories of people who may, in similar situations, want to understand their general legal options:

None of this is a suggestion that anyone should file a claim. It is simply a snapshot of who tends to be involved when situations like this arise.

How Cases Like This Generally Work

On the civil side, a medical malpractice case generally begins with a detailed investigation. A plaintiff's attorney typically gathers medical records, consults with independent medical experts, and evaluates whether the care provided fell below the accepted standard. In Massachusetts, malpractice claims are often reviewed by a special "tribunal" that screens whether there is enough evidence to proceed. Plaintiffs must generally prove their case by a preponderance of the evidence — meaning it is more likely than not that the provider's negligence caused the harm. That is a lower bar than the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard used in criminal court.

Evidence in these cases can include the patient's chart, prescription histories, appointment notes, communications between providers, and expert testimony explaining what should have been done differently. Damages may cover medical expenses, lost income, pain and suffering, and, in wrongful death matters, losses to surviving family members.

Timelines matter. Massachusetts generally applies a three-year statute of limitations for medical malpractice claims, though the clock may start on the date of injury or when the injury reasonably should have been discovered. There is also an overall cap known as a statute of repose that limits how far back a claim can reach. These deadlines are strict and vary by state — for example, Montana applies its own separate rules and shorter windows in some circumstances.

On the criminal side, after a mistrial the prosecution generally has several options: schedule a retrial, negotiate a resolution, or, in rare cases, decline to proceed further. Double jeopardy protections generally do not bar a retrial when the first trial ended because of a hung jury.

What to Watch Next

Readers following this story or similar cases can generally expect a few developments:

As always, allegations in civil complaints are just that — allegations — until they are proven or admitted.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a mistrial, and does it mean the defendant is innocent?

A mistrial generally means the trial ended without a valid verdict, often because the jury could not agree. It is not a finding of guilt or innocence. Prosecutors typically decide whether to retry the case, offer a plea, or drop the charges.

Can prosecutors retry a case after a hung jury?

Yes. Retrying a case after a jury deadlocks generally does not violate double jeopardy protections in the United States. Whether prosecutors actually retry depends on factors like the strength of the evidence and input from affected families.

What does 'not guilty by lack of criminal responsibility' mean?

In Massachusetts, this is a legal standard that may apply when a defendant, because of a mental disease or defect, could not appreciate the wrongfulness of their conduct or conform their behavior to the law. It is different from a straight 'not guilty' verdict and can lead to civil commitment for treatment.

Can a civil malpractice case proceed while a criminal case is still pending?

Generally, yes. Civil and criminal cases are separate proceedings with different parties, standards of proof, and remedies. A civil case may sometimes be paused, but it does not automatically stop because of a related criminal matter.

How does someone prove medical malpractice involving psychiatric care?

Plaintiffs generally need to show that a provider's care fell below the accepted professional standard and that this failure caused measurable harm. Expert testimony from other clinicians is usually essential, and cases can turn on detailed reviews of records, prescriptions, and treatment decisions.

How long do families generally have to file a malpractice claim?

Deadlines vary by state. Massachusetts generally allows three years from the date of injury or discovery, with an overall outer limit known as a statute of repose. Other states, such as Montana, apply their own separate deadlines, so consulting a local attorney promptly is generally important.

What kinds of damages can a wrongful death or malpractice lawsuit recover?

Damages may include medical costs, lost income, funeral expenses, and compensation for pain and suffering or loss of companionship. The exact categories and any statutory caps vary significantly by state and by the nature of the claim.

Are jurors allowed to talk about a case after it ends?

Generally, yes. Once a case is over, jurors in the United States are typically free to discuss their experience, though courts may issue specific instructions in unusual cases. Their public comments can offer insight into how deliberations unfolded but do not change the legal outcome.

See what this looks like on your firm's site

This is the kind of page NewsFeed publishes on a law firm's own website within hours of a story like this breaking. Your first three articles are free.

Start free →

Original reporting: wcvb.com.

Disclaimer: This article is provided for general informational purposes only and discusses publicly reported news. NewsFeed is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. Nothing in this post creates an attorney-client relationship or should be relied on as legal advice. If you believe you may have a legal claim, contact a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction.